Skip to content

Max Performance vs. Optimized Editability

Comparing Design Methodologies for Tailored Project Outcomes 

Novineer Capabilities
Editable Model
 Max Performance

Maximizing Performance through Topology Optimization

Peak Efficiency Design


Novineer's generative design software employs varied design methodologies tailored to user needs, allowing for the selection between prioritizing maximized performance or opting for optimized performance with an emphasis on editability. When users opt for maximized performance, the design algorithm utilizes its topology optimization capabilities, focusing on local features to explore an extensive range of design possibilities. Each design is evaluated against performance criteria and weight constraints, making this mode especially suitable for projects aimed at achieving peak efficiency or developing a conceptual design for future enhancements.

Optimizing for Performance with Editability

Adaptable Design for Future Adaptability

Alternatively, the option for optimized performance with an emphasis on editability caters to the evolving nature of design and the necessity for adaptability. In this methodology, discrete geometric elements, rather than local features, are employed to enhance performance. This approach is ideal for projects that foresee future modifications or require a level of customization. It simplifies alterations post-design, ensuring that the initial model acts as a flexible foundation rather than an immutable blueprint. This flexibility allows designers and engineers to refine generated designs, making adjustments to improve usability and incorporate additional features, thus better aligning with design requirements.


Comparing Methodologies for Tailored Project Outcomes

Navigating Design Choices with Novineer

GIF Perfromance vs Editability (7)

By providing the choice between optimized and maximized performance with a focus on editability, Novineer enables users to make strategic decisions that align with their specific project goals. Additionally, users can select both options to compare the outcomes of each design methodology, determining which best fulfills their needs. This comparative feature offers a significant advantage, facilitating an analysis of how different prioritizations affect the final design. It allows for a side-by-side evaluation of the trade-offs between enhancing performance metrics and achieving a design that, while still highly efficient, offers greater flexibility for future modifications or improvements.